Legal Opinion

Egan v. Byrnes

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 1916No. 8436Published

Error to El Paso District Court. Hon. W. S. Morris, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This action was brought by the defendant in error to set aside a deed executed by his wife, Mary Byrnes, to her two unmarried sisters, the plaintiffs in error, purporting to convey a lot with the buildings thereon, in Colorado Springs, valued at about $3,000. The reasons alleged are undue influence exercised in obtaining the deed, and the imbecility of mind of the grantor at the time the deed was issued. Trial was to the court, which found for the plaintiff. The only substantial error urged is the insufficiency of the testimony to support the findings.

The sole question for us to determine is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denver City Tramway Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Bank of Bromfield v. McKinleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. A. Peterson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Denver Trackage & Improvement Co. v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Beggs v. TrumpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API