Legal Opinion

Tilford & Anderson v. Burnham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 22, 1838PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Chancery. From the Circuit Court for Garrard County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Tilford and Anderson having sued one Ewell on two promissory notes for about six hundred dollars, the attorney'who prosecuted their actions agreed to institute and prosecute an action, also, for Thompson Burnham, on a note he held on Ewell, for about eight hundred dollars; but, as he doubted whether he could make both debts, he undertook for Burnham, on the express condition that, in the event of a conflict of interest, Tilford and Anderson should be preferred, and be entitled to priority.

Accordingly, judgments having been obtained for both parties at the same term, but for Tilford and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mathews v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. First National Bank v. HirschkowitzSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  5. Small v. Westchester Fire Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API