Legal Opinion
Appeal of Kulacz
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 5, 2000No. 99-018PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
The petitioner, Brian Kulacz, appeals a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) that his claim for indemnity benefits from the respondents, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, is time-barred. See RSA 281-A:48, I (1999). We affirm.
At the time of the board’s decision on September 18, 1998, the petitioner was a nineteen-year employee of the DOT. On August 28, 1991, the petitioner injured his back while working for the DOT as a bituminous plant inspector. After the injury, the DOT submitted an “Employer’s First Report…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Appeal of Cloutier Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Appeal of BergeronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of KruzelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pierce v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Forbes Farm Partnership v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- In re PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Trachy v. LaFramboiseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- New Canaan Bank & Trust v. PfefferSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001