Legal Opinion
Hildreth v. Mastoras
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 29, 1918No. 7466PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit by Herbert L. Hildreth against Jim M. Mastoras.
1Opinion of the Court
WOEVERTON, District Judge.
This is a suit for injunction to restrain an alleged infringement by defendant of complainant’s patent. Complainant is the owner of what is known as the" Herbert M. Dickinson patent, letters patent for which were issued to him, being numbered 831,501. The device is for pulling candy. Claim 1, which it is claimed is being infringed, is as follows:
“A candy-pulling machine, comprising a plurality of oppositely disposed candy hooks or supports, a candy puller, and means for producing a specified relative in-and-out motion of these parts, for the purpose sot forth.”
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Schute v. HildrethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925