Legal Opinion

Orr v. Baker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1853PublishedCited by 26 opinions

ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Assumpsit by Baker against Orr, on a promissory note. Plea, failure of consideration. Demurrer to the plea sustained, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff below.

The plea alleges that the trustees of the Evansville Presbyterian church were seized in fee of lot No. 107, in Evansville, being less than ten acres, to-wit: fronting *87on Main street seventy-five feet, and on Second street one hundred and fifty feet; that on part of said lot the house of worship of the said church was erected; that on the parcel of said lot not occupied by said meetinghouse, business houses had been erected and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Grand MasterIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Buffalo City Cemetery v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Hart v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API