LeBlanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
The Court of Appeals has reversed and remanded this Court’s Memorandum Decision of October 15,1996, concluding “that the district judge’s decision was based on clear errors of both fact and law.” 1 LeBlanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher, 143 F.3d 748, 757 (2d Cir.1998). The case was remanded for a calculation of a reasonable fee to be awarded to the plaintiffs “in light of their substantial victory against the Village,” id. at 763, despite the fact that the plaintiffs were completely unsuccessful as to most of the defendants and received neither compensatory nor punitive…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keith v. MassanariCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Bronx Household of Faith v. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Rexach Construction Co. v. QB Construction, SETribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2003