Spartan Carpet Distributors, Inc. v. Bailey
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Action by appellant (seller) for balance due on carpet sold to respondent (buyer). Seller originally filed, in Associate Circuit Court, a petition for amount due on an open account that buyer, a carpet layer, had with seller. After a judgment for buyer, seller took a trial de novo. After the trial de novo, the court, sitting without a jury, found for buyer. We affirm.
Seller asserts on appeal that it was entitled as a matter of law to recover on a cause of action on account stated. In response to the appeal, buyer argues that seller’s action was based on a theory of failure to pay…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gerstner v. Lithocraft StudiosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Chisler v. StaatsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Holtschneider v. HoltschneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Whelan's, Inc. v. Bob Eldridge Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grant Selsor & Sons Lumber Co. v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Honigmann v. C & L Restaurant Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hammock v. Miller (In re Estate of Miller)Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- THAYER FARM CENTER/MEYER FEED, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DON BUSH, SR., JALONNE BUSH, DON BUSH, JR., and SALLY BUSHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024