Legal Opinion

Spartan Carpet Distributors, Inc. v. Bailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1987No. 51678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Action by appellant (seller) for balance due on carpet sold to respondent (buyer). Seller originally filed, in Associate Circuit Court, a petition for amount due on an open account that buyer, a carpet layer, had with seller. After a judgment for buyer, seller took a trial de novo. After the trial de novo, the court, sitting without a jury, found for buyer. We affirm.

Seller asserts on appeal that it was entitled as a matter of law to recover on a cause of action on account stated. In response to the appeal, buyer argues that seller’s action was based on a theory of failure to pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gerstner v. Lithocraft StudiosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Chisler v. StaatsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Holtschneider v. HoltschneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Whelan's, Inc. v. Bob Eldridge Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant Selsor & Sons Lumber Co. v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Honigmann v. C & L Restaurant Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Hammock v. Miller (In re Estate of Miller)Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. THAYER FARM CENTER/MEYER FEED, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DON BUSH, SR., JALONNE BUSH, DON BUSH, JR., and SALLY BUSHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API