Legal Opinion

Mateen v. Saar

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 4, 2003No. 121, Sept. Term, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

829 A.2d 1007 (2003)

376 Md. 385

Muhsin R. MATEEN

v.

Mary Ann SAAR, et al.

No. 121, Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 4, 2003.

Nancy S. Forster, Deputy Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Andrew H. Baida, Solicitor General (J. Joseph Curran, Atty. Gen., Scott S. Oakley, Asst. Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for respondents.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

BATTAGLIA, J

This case comes to us from a judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirming the Circuit Court for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API