Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Zurich American Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2010No. DA 09-0507PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Terry Boyd (Boyd) failed to petition the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) within two years of Zurich’s denial of workers’ compensation benefits. The WCC granted Zurich’s motion. Boyd appeals. We affirm.

ISSUE

¶2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the WCC erred in granting Zurich’s motion for summary judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 In November 2004, Terry Boyd began working as a pipefitter for TIC, a Wyoming industrial contractor. Boyd was injured in a work-related accident on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrendalMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Plainbull v. Transamerica InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bryant v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Prillaman v. Community Medical CenterMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dildine v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weidow v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ford v. Sentry Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ford v. Sentry Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Weidow v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API