Legal Opinion

Baskin v. Collins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1991No. 91-57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court found that the appellant-plaintiffs, who were purchasers of real estate, did not have a claim for misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, or outrage and granted summary judgment for the appellee-defendants. We affirm the decision.

The facts, reviewed most favorably to appellants, are summarized as follows. Five men regularly drank coffee together at Jake’s Restaurant in Springdale. Early one morning a real estate agent phoned Wayne Scoggins, one of the five, and said he had a real estate listing which might interest Scoggins. Scoggins replied, “Why…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MFA Mutual Insurance v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. FIDELITY MORTG. CO. OF TEXAS v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. FIDELITY MORTG. CO. OF TEXAS v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. First Arkansas Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API