Baskin v. Collins
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The trial court found that the appellant-plaintiffs, who were purchasers of real estate, did not have a claim for misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, or outrage and granted summary judgment for the appellee-defendants. We affirm the decision.
The facts, reviewed most favorably to appellants, are summarized as follows. Five men regularly drank coffee together at Jake’s Restaurant in Springdale. Early one morning a real estate agent phoned Wayne Scoggins, one of the five, and said he had a real estate listing which might interest Scoggins. Scoggins replied, “Why…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MFA Mutual Insurance v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- FIDELITY MORTG. CO. OF TEXAS v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- FIDELITY MORTG. CO. OF TEXAS v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- First Arkansas Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013