Legal Opinion

Merchants' Ice Co. v. Scott & Dodson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1916No. 5604. [fn*]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. F. Ezell, Judge. Action by Scott & Dodson against the Merchants’ Ice Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSwearingen, J.

Appellees sued appellant, a corporation, to recover $7,300 for professional services rendered in behalf of appellant, and alleged in the alternative an express or an implied contract, or on a quantum meruit. Appellees alleged that the president of the corporation incurred the liability for attorneys’ fees, and that all the stockholders concurred therein; that their services were necessary and resulted in substantial benefits to the corporation; that all the stockholders and the president accepted all the benefits for the corporation, with full knowledge of appellees’ professional services,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Fort Worth Publishing Co. v. Hitson & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Scott v. Farmers & Merchants National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Taussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Taylor v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pullman Co. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Stedman Fruit Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. West Texas Utilities Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Standard Scale & Supply Co. v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API