Ponder v. Budweiser of Asheville, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendants, noting the plaintiff’s evidence as to diminution of profits in the corporate farming operation, contend that the trial court erred “. . . by permitting the plaintiff to speculate as to profits which the corporation might have made . . . [in that] no allegation of such special damage appears in the complaint . . . and . . . [s] peculative evidence of corporation profits are not permitted to show loss of income or earning capacity in a personal injury action.” We agree.
Here plaintiff’s complaint alleges loss of income and earning capacity, but fails to allege properly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Hendler v. CoffeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Singer v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Amelsburg v. LunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Corbett v. SeamonsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Amerson v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993