Legal Opinion

Hathcock v. National Bank of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1978No. 56019PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

After a proper motion and hearing, the court granted summary judgment in favor of National Bank of Georgia in its suit against Hathcock on two promissory notes. Hatchcock appeals, contending material issues of fact remain, but we affirm.

"The petitioner presented, prima facie, by the pleadings and [its] affidavit, that [it] was entitled to judgment on the promissory note. The respondent at that stage of the proceeding failed to come forward with any evidence so as to create an issue of fact to be decided by a jury.” Meade v. Heimanson, 239 Ga. 177, 180-181 (236 SE2d 357) (1977).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meade v. HeimansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hart v. Trust Co. of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Thomasson v. Pineco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Concept-National, Inc. v. DIMATTINA SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Pollard v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALBANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Carlos Jones Construction Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API