Selected Lands Corp. v. Speich
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
We supplement our opinion, 702 S.W.2d 197 (1985), to address appellees’ contentions that we: 1) misstated facts and 2) ignored other holdings of this court.
Appellees contend that we erroneously found that the developers provided the residents of Bluebonnet Country with a golf course, lakes, and tennis courts, because no such testimony is in the record. By order granted November 7, 1984, the deposition testimony of appellee Speich was included in the record. This testimony contains several references to the subdivision’s existing golf course, tennis courts, and catfish…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Selected Lands Corp. v. Speich, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Keith v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Gibbs v. Garden Oaks Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990