Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mellier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

Action on a negotiable promissory note by plaintiff, the indorsee. The suit was defended on the ground that the defendant was a mere accommodation indorser, and that plaintiff, by forbearing to sue the maker, had discharged the indorser. Neither position is a tenable one. The doctrine is well settled that an indorser, after his liability is once fixed, will not be released by forbearance in bringing suit against any of the parties liable (Clark vs. Barret, 19 Mo., 39). Nor does it avail as’a defense (except as between the indorser and the person to whom he grants the use of his name) that no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. MottNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Grant v. EllicottNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Clark v. BarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Priest v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Boatmen's Savings Bank v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API