State v. Miclau

I concur in paragraph one of the syllabus but dissent from paragraphs two and three thereof and from the judgment.

The majority opinion herein cites a paragraph of the opinion of this court in Fisher v. State, 84 Ohio St., 360, 95 N. E., 908, in an apparent attempt to bolster its position that in a prosecution such as this the state must establish beyond a reasonable doubt some delinquency which the defendant either “aided, abetted, induced, caused, encouraged” or to which he “contributed.”

Following the citation of such paragraph, the majority opinion states: “It was not sufficient to…