Creighton v. Kuttruff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: In the absence of any showing that the convenience of witnesses on *988either side will be promoted, we feel that the moving papers do not disclose sufficient basis for the exercise of the court’s discretion to change the place of trial from Monroe to Wayne County. All concur. (Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term granting defendant’s motion to change the place of trial of the consolidated action from Monroe County to Wayne County.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Putnam Ranches, Inc. v. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Sparklin v. Jackson & Perkins Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957