Legal Opinion

Murchison v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 1, 1933No. Docket No. 62838Published

Where a right to royalty of oil produced is reserved in an assignment of a lease covering oil land, the lessee-assignor is entitled to take depletion as a deduction. Palmer v. Bender,287 U.S. 551.

1Opinion of the Court

MRS. A. H. MURCHISON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Murchison v. Commissioner

Docket No. 62838.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

28 B.T.A. 257; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1152;

June 1, 1933, Promulgated

Where a right to royalty of oil produced is reserved in an assignment of a lease covering oil land, the lessee-assignor is entitled to take depletion as a deduction. Palmer v. Bender,287 U.S. 551.

Harry C. Weeks, Esq., for the petitioner.

T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

SEAWELL

OPINION.

SEAWELL: The respondent determined a deficiency of $415.89 in income tax for 1929,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Murchison v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API