Seaton v. Widlitze
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, Charles W. Seaton, instituted this action against defendants, John J. Widlitze and Norma Widlitze, as parents and guardians of their minor son, John A. Widlitze, and John A. Widlitze individually, to recover damages sustained to plaintiff’s automobile as a result of a collision allegedly caused by the. negligence of defendants’ son. Defendant, Norma Wid-litze, filed an exception of no right or cause of action to plaintiff’s suit. Additionally, the defendants denied liability and asserted a reconventional demand against the plaintiff for damages to the automobile of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Schindler v. GageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bettis v. Paulsen-Webber Cordage Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Close v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Higgins v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977