Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Warrick Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackford, J. —

This was an indictment against the defendant, as clerk of the Warrick Circuit Court, for extortion.

The indictment was amended on motion of the prosecuting attorney; but it was afterwards quashed on the defendant’s motion.

The indictment originally commenced as follows: “ Warrick county,' ss. The grand jurors impanneled and sworn to inquire for the state of Indiana, and for the body of the county of Warrick, upon their ■- present,” &c.; the word oath, after the word their, being omitted. The inserting of the omitted word was the amendment made. The defendant objects to that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. OdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API