State v. Moore
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Warrick Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Blackford, J. —
This was an indictment against the defendant, as clerk of the Warrick Circuit Court, for extortion.
The indictment was amended on motion of the prosecuting attorney; but it was afterwards quashed on the defendant’s motion.
The indictment originally commenced as follows: “ Warrick county,' ss. The grand jurors impanneled and sworn to inquire for the state of Indiana, and for the body of the county of Warrick, upon their ■- present,” &c.; the word oath, after the word their, being omitted. The inserting of the omitted word was the amendment made. The defendant objects to that…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. OdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Sekhar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013