Legal Opinion

Lundy v. Orr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Paul V. Lundy, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of December, 1922, granting respondent’s motion for judgment dismissing the complaint, made upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

The amended complaint which was here dismissed is for services rendered by plaintiff in assisting defendants in connection with a business in which defendants were copartners, according to the complaint, duly engaged as brokers in the business of buying, selling and otherwise dealing in liquors, liquor certificates, warehouse receipts and certificates and other papers showing the lawful and legal possession of liquor, the complaint alleging that at all the times mentioned therein the vendors, vendees and others in the transactions were respectively duly authorized and duly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adler v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadows v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Gass v. WetmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Lennox v. MeehanNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Meyer v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API