Legal Opinion

Chapman v. M/G Transport Services, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

This matter is now before me on the motion of the defendant, M/G Transport Services, Inc. (M/G), engaged in the business of repairing towboats and barges along with other non-maritime machinery, for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Robert Chapman, former employee of the defendant. The plaintiff has filed an admiralty and maritime action consisting of a claim for maintenance and cure, a Jones Act claim, 46 U.S.C. § 688 1 and a general maritime claim based on unseaworthiness of the defendant’s vessel, all as a result of an accident which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Thomas W. Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Henry E. Rao v. Hillman Barge & Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Specht v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. American Commercial Barge LinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Berry v. American Commercial Barge LinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Spearman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API