Astor v. Turner
New York Court of Chancery
These were appeals from an order made in these causes, by the vice chancellor of the first circuit. The facts are stated in the chancellor’s opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
These cases came tóófe ine upon the separate appeal of W. Skidmore, in each suit, frota an order of the vice chancellor of the first circuit, made in both suits, for the appointment of a receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises. There Was a final decree in each suit, for the sale of the premises mentioned in the complainant’s bill therein; with a decree ever against the mortgagor for the deficiency, if any. The premises were sold by the taaster on the 31st of October, 1844, and were bid in by the complainant •; leaving a deficiency pf $600, due upon the decree in…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Ellis v. Boston, Hartford & Erie RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Giles v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Haas v. Chicago Building SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Schreiber v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Scott v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.