Legal Opinion

State v. Dean

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 1994No. 93-3103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress contraband, not as an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but solely as a violation of the defendant’s right to privacy under the Florida Constitution. We do not find that this random investigatory encounter and consensual search for contraband, which did not violate the Fourth Amendment or article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, runs afoul of Florida’s constitutional right to privacy, article I, section 23 of the Florida Constitution. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Shaktman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. HumeSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API