State v. Dean
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PARIENTE, Judge.
The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress contraband, not as an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but solely as a violation of the defendant’s right to privacy under the Florida Constitution. We do not find that this random investigatory encounter and consensual search for contraband, which did not violate the Fourth Amendment or article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, runs afoul of Florida’s constitutional right to privacy, article I, section 23 of the Florida Constitution. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shaktman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. HumeSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001