Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Bradley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1980No. 52262, 52263, 52411, 52814Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Ryan

I agree with the majority that the obvious mistake of the legislature in providing a more severe penalty for possession of a schedule IV controlled substance in section 402(b) of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 5614, par. 1402(b)) than is provided for the delivery of a similar controlled substance under section 401(e) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 5614, par. 1401(e)) renders the penalty provided for the possession of a schedule IV controlled substance invalid. I do not agree, however, that the defendants charged with the offense of possession of a schedule IV…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. People ex rel. Bradley v. Illinois State ReformatoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. VraniakIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API