Glasscock v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
BIRD, Judge.
Appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of fifteen years upon conviction of carnally knowing a female in violation of KRS 435.100(1) (b). He contends that the judgment should be reversed because the trial court improperly, and to his prejudice, admitted into the evidence a letter written by him to the prosecuting witness after his arrest. He further complains that prosecutor’s closing argument was improper and prejudicial.
The letter reads as follows:
“September 21, 1956
“I get so lonesome for you that I wish I could die. And I did it all because I love you so much.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Wright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- MaGruder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
- Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lear v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Eisner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Commonwealth v. HillebrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974