Legal Opinion

Nye v. Rose

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition for a writ of mandamus. On return to the alternative writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

In June, 1890, the District of Narragansett, without legislative authority, voted to establish a sinking fund for the payment of its bonded indebtedness, setting aside one thousand dollars for that purpose out of the tax for that year, and appointed the respondent commissioner of said sinking fund. He received said sum, which he invested, and for which he holds the security. In July, 1891, the General Assembly enacted, Pub. Laws, cap. 1035, of July 24, 1891, as follows : “ The District Council of the District of Narragansett are hereby authorized to establish by ordinance a board of three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cummings v. HeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. American Railway-Frog Co. v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. State ex rel. Hodges v. PowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. Burr v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  5. Kelly v. WimberlyMississippi Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kopriva v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Mack v. CostelloSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API