Legal Opinion

Ligo v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1930No. Appeal, 67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial and also judgment n. o. v. Appellees move to quash, alleging that appellants have omitted from the record some 100 exhibits, used at trial to aid in the determination of the question whether the will under contest was executed by the deceased, the main issue in the case.

An examination of the record shows that the exhibits in question were admitted in evidence by the trial judge, and so became part of the record. Under these circumstances, appellants were obliged to print them for review by this court, unless they were omitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snyder's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin Trust Co. v. Franklin Valveless Engine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API