Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Attorney General of Virginia

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 7, 1994No. Record 930413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

Code § 2.1-122 permits the Governor of Virginia, under certain circumstances, to employ “special counsel” to act instead of the Attorney General. The narrow issue we consider in this appeal is whether under the facts presented, counsel appointed by the Governor to provide comprehensive legal representation to a state agency constitutes special counsel within the intendment of Code § 2.1-122.

The facts relevant to our resolution of this controversy are not in dispute. The Office of the Attorney General provides regular legal representation to the Commonwealth, her agencies and officers. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Marsh v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Clinchfield Carbocoal Corp. v. KiserSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yeatts v. MurraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  2. Mouberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. Laurels of Bon Air, LLC v. Medical Facilities of America LIV Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CuffeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. City of South Boston v. Halifax CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API