Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Doe ex rel. Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2006No. 05-30294Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge,

concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in the judgment in part:

I would hold that Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 103 S.Ct. 3330, 77 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983), rather than Lemon v. Kurtz-man, 403 U.S. 602, 91 S.Ct. 2105, 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), applies to this deliberative body. I disagree with the conclusion that the four stipulated prayers violate Marsh. As to the question of how to apply Marsh, I read Marsh as prohibiting exploitation of prayer opportunities to advance one religion over another. Therefore, the injunction should be vacated in full…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lee v. WeismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Marsh v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API