Legal Opinion

McCall v. First National Bank

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1929No. 5117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

Action against an attachment plaintiff and the sheriff in conversion for the sale of mortgaged property. Respondent bank commenced an action in the probate court on February 14, 1924, against Hugh Poling, his wife, Harley Poling, and Margaret R. Poling to recover $198.25, alleged balance due on a promissory note. Plaintiff had judgment against Hugh Poling and wife for the amount claimed, interest, $40’ attorney fees, and costs. On appeal to the district court the cause was tried anew to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment against said defendants for $198.25. On appeal to this court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. Texas Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Osterholm v. Boston & Montana Con. C. & S. Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. First Nat. Bank of Pocatello v. PolingIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. WalmstadIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford v. ConnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Terry v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Monson v. BoydIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Common School District No. 27 v. Twin Falls National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. WhelanIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API