Legal Opinion

Whiting v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 1966No. [App. No. 20, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Applicant had previously been convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore of robbery on November 1, 1963, and had been sentenced to not more than 18 months in the Maryland Institution for Men. Subsequently, on January 18, 1965, he was found to be a defective delinquent by Judge Cardin, sitting without a jury, and committed to the Patuxent Institution pursuant to Code (1957, 1965 Cum. Supp.), Article 31B, Section 5. Application for leave to appeal and a memorandum in support thereof have been filed on his behalf by his court appointed attorney. He sets forth the following contentions:

1. That…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Blakney v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Colbert v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Mumford v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shields v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Shine v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Fox v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API