Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1968No. 414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Justice.

Charles J. Schindler, appellant, filed suit in an effort to cancel an oil, gas and mineral lease on his land. He contended in the trial court as well as here, that appel-lees’ lease had terminated on November 1, 1965. The appellees defended contending that their lease was in full force and effect at the time they drilled a well on December 3, 1965; that a certain provision in the lease relied on by appellant as causing the termination of the lease, was ambiguous as a matter of law; therefore, they were permitted to introduce evidence explaining the ambiguity. The appellees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Crain v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Turner v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Lovenberg v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Super Starr International, LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Garza v. Allied Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Austin Area Teachers Federal Credit Union v. First City Bank-Northwest Hills, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Amend v. LightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. 20100 Eastex, LLC v. Saltgrass, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API