Legal Opinion

Nunez v. Emanuel County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1918No. 9273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Swainsboro—Judge Kirkland. September 24, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. In a suit against a county for damage alleged to have, been caused by a defective bridge, the plaintiff can not recover unless the proper county authorities had knowledge of the defective condition, or unless the defect had existed for such a length of time that:-knowl- » edge thereof on the parr of the county authorities would be presumed (Stamps v. Newton County, 8 Ga. App. 230 (3b)) (68 S. E. 947); and it is a jury question as to what length of time a defect in a bridge must exist before a county is charged with knowledge of negligence. City of Rome v. Brooks, 7 Ga. App. 244 (66 S. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stamps v. Newton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. City of Rome v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Barnesville v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Wilkes County v. TankersleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Stone v. McMeekin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API