Legal Opinion

Lightner v. Prentis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1909No. Docket No. 35Published

Appeal from Wayne; Murphy, J. Petition .by Clarence A. Lightner against John F. Prentis, James T. Keena, trustee, and Lawrence Richard for a writ of assistance. From an order granting the writ, Browse T. Prentis, claiming ownership, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

After the decision in this case by this court (Chapoton v. Prentis, 144 Mich. 283 [107 N. W. 879]), the case was remanded to the court below for further proceedings in accordance with that opinion. The defendant John F. Prentis did not comply with that decree, and the case proceeded to a decree of sale thereunder, and Clarence A. Lightner became the purchaser at said sale. The sale was duly reported to the court, was confirmed, and a commissioner’s deed duly executed and delivered to Mr. Lightner on March 5, 1908, and duly recorded. On May 8, 1908, Mr. Lightner caused a demand for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapoton v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API