Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cocke v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 13, 2005No. 10-04-00056-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceTom Gray, Chief Justice

Under the authority of Billups, an instruction defining what an accomplice is and a generic accomplice-witness instruction under article 38.14 should have been given. Billups v. State, 46 S.W.2d 973 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932); Tex. Code CRIM. Peoc. Ann. art 38.14 (Vernon 2005).

Under the authority of Herron, the failure to give the instruction was some harm. Herron v. State, 86 S.W.3d 621 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).

I concur in the judgment of the majority.

Any further discussion in the majority opinion about what should have been included in the charge and what the jury could or could not do based upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Billups v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API