Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Hamre

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this action the plaintiffs seek relief on the ground of a failure of consideration upon their purchase from the defendant on October 19th, 1931, of a leasehold interest in a lot in Branford, which is a part of land owned in fee by the First Ecclesiastical Society of Branford, the title of which was fully discussed in our opinion in Hamre v. Etzel & Sons, Inc., 120 Conn. 129, 131, 179 Atl. 647. The following undisputed facts appear in the finding: For a long time prior to October 24th, 1914, the Ecclesiastical Society was the owner in fee of land in Branford which it had demised to Samuel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Hine v. McNerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Hamre v. Michael Etzel & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patalano v. ChabotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Rocklen, Inc. v. RadulescoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API