Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFernandez, Circuit Judge
I agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it decided to issue a preliminary injunction requiring the consideration of “financial ability” and “alternative conditions of supervision”1 in making determinations regarding the release of aliens who have been detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). However, I do not agree with the breadth of the in-junctive order that was issued. Thus, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part..
A. Concurrence
While I do generally concur in the merits decision itself (including parts I and II and the portion of the opinion which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015