Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 2017No. 16-56829Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFernandez, Circuit Judge

I agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it decided to issue a preliminary injunction requiring the consideration of “financial ability” and “alternative conditions of supervision”1 in making determinations regarding the release of aliens who have been detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). However, I do not agree with the breadth of the in-junctive order that was issued. Thus, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part..

A. Concurrence

While I do generally concur in the merits decision itself (including parts I and II and the portion of the opinion which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
  3. Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API