People v. Miller
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtJoel J. Tyler, J.
PROBLEM
Has the defendant’s admitted mental disease now assumed such stature that he is unable to understand the proceedings against him or assist counsel in his defense? This condition, if found to exist, would categorize him as an "Incapacitated person” (CPL 730.10, subd 1) and abort further proceedings with respect to any of his three outstanding cases. Examination by two psychiatrists was ordered and a hearing was thereafter held under CPL 730.30 to determine defendant’s competency.
DECISION
Upon all of the evidence, including my careful scrutiny of the defendant during the hearing, I am…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- People v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. ReasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. EspositoNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Angelillo, New York County Courts1980
- People v. GrissetNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. ClaronNew York Supreme Court · 1980