Legal Opinion
Gaulden v. Southern Pac. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 29, 1948No. 27065PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
This case involves the right of plaintiff, an employee of Pacific Fruit Express Company, a corporation engaged in railroad refrigeration service, to maintain an action for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., against the Pacific Fruit Express Company and the Southern Pacific Company, a railroad common carrier.
The parties have stipulated that upon the pleadings and stipulation of facts submitted at pre-trial conference, the Court shall determine whether plaintiff, at the time of the accident and injury complained of, was an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alan R. Folkestad, and Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hall v. Minnesota Transfer Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Edwards v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dougall v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Hetman v. Fruit Growers Express CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.