Legal Opinion
Rochefort v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 11, 2005No. S05A1413PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLEY, Justice.
Appellant Richard Rochefort was tried before the trial court on an accusation charging him with possession of more than 300 tablets of ephedrine, possession of methamphetamine and shoplifting. At the close of the State’s evidence, he moved for a directed verdict of acquittal, in which motion he included a challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA § 16-13-30.3 (b) (1). The trial court denied the motion, and found Appellant guilty on all counts. He appeals from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered by the trial court on its findings of his guilt.
1. OCGA § 16-13-30.3…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lavelle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Means v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Hanson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Buckner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of S. C. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Christopher Michael Buckner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.