Legal Opinion
Ernst v. Lamb
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 5, 1923No. 10,342PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Defendants in error move to dismiss the writ under rule 16 of the Rules of 1917 (161 Pac. VIII) : “A writ of error shall not be brought after the expiration of two years from the rendition of the judgment complained of.”
*133This rule was promulgated by this court under the authority of the act of March 3, 1913:
“The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of practice and procedure in all courts of record and may change or rescind the same. Such rules shall supersede any statute in conflict therewith.” S. L. 1913, p. 447.
Plaintiff in error, however, claims that S. L. 1911, p. 12, sec. 8, giving three…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bates v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. ArnoldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Kolkman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Burney v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.