Legal Opinion
Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 3, 2002No. 94-CV-6343LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
This action is before the Court on remand from the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, for further proceedings on the issue of whether the requirements of the diversity jurisdiction statute, 28 ILS.C. § 1832(a), have been satisfied so as to bring this ease within the subject matter jurisdiction of - this Court. See Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc., 216 F.3d 291 (2d Cir.2000). Having heard further argument and received further submissions from the parties concerning the issues relating to the existence of diversity jurisdiction, the Court makes…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Fox v. Cheminova, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Canandaigua Emergency Squad, Inc. v. Rochester Area Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011