Legal Opinion

Marsigli v. C. W. Averill Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 7, 1962No. 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

During trial the plaintiff conceded that her case would fail unless the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor was applicable. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff is here asserting error in the charge of the court. The defendant takes the position that the result reached by the jury ought not to be disturbed because its motion for a directed verdict ought to have been granted in any event. It says that res ipsa loquitor does not apply here.

At a time when plaintiff was shopping in a hardware store then operated by the defendant, she approached a counter where merchandise was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Joly v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  3. Cohen v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Krulee v. F. C. Huyck & SonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  5. McDonnell v. Montgomery Ward & CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Bonnie Lee Jamieson Deveny, B.N.F. Frank Jamieson, and Frank Jamieson v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertshaw Fulton Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Cyr v. Green Mountain Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Larmay v. VanEttenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Hershenson v. Lake Champlain Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API