Legal Opinion
In Re Solar Mfg. Corp. (Three Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 1954No. 11260, 11261 and 11262PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This dispute is about fees allowed in a proceeding under Chapter X of' the Bankruptcy Act. The record is familiar to us. On prior appeals we have (1) reversed an order approving a sale of the debtor’s assets because not included in a plan, 1949, 176 F.2d 493; (2) reversed an order denying a motion to reduce the number of trustees and affirmed an order granting interim allowances, 1951, 190 F.2d 493; (3) affirmed an order, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 859, asserting jurisdiction as to counterclaims against a creditor, 1952, 200 F.2d 327, and (4) vacated an •order for final…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Solar Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- In Re Solar Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- In Re Detroit International Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- In Re Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Matter of Cle-Ware Industries, Inc., Debtor. Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. v. Howard SokolskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- In re Imperial "400" National, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- American Guaranty Corporation and Harry H. Burton, Receiver v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- In Re Polycast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- In Re Texaco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.