Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garcia-Torres v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2009No. 64A03-0812-CR-630Published

1DissentCrone, Judge

I believe that the taking of a cheek swab from a custodial suspect for purposes of extracting a DNA profile is a search requiring probable cause under the Fourth Amendment and is subject to the advice-of-counsel requirements of Pirtle As such, I conclude that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting the DNA evidence obtained from Garcia-Torres's cheek swab in this case. Also, I believe that Garcia-Torres was entitled to severance of the charges against him as a matter of right. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

To reiterate, the U.S. Supreme Court stated in Schmerber that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API