Cornman v. Sidle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The mere fact that there is an apparent obstruction, calculated to impress doubt and apprehension in the mind of purchasers and thus prevent them from bidding upon the property, is generally sufficient to warrant equity in decreeing its removal. 2 Freeman, Ex. § 424; Beck v. Burdett, 1 Paige, Ch. 305; Myers v. Hewitt, 16 Ohio 449; Cornell v. Badway, 22 Wis. 251; Fowler v. McCartney, 27 Miss. 509; Oallman v. Perrie, 47 Miss. 131; Tuck v. Olds, 29 Fed. 739; Kugath v.…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The allegations of the complaint are that on February 25, 1895, the plaintiff obtained and docketed in Hennepin county a judgment against the defendant Sidle, which is still unpaid, and upon which execution had been issued and returned unsatisfied; that at the date of the rendition and docketing of the judgment Sidle owned certain real estate in Hennepin county, the absolute ti-*85tie to which stood of record in his name; that thereafter, with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the plaintiff, he executed to the defendant bank, and placed on record, a conveyance of this land, in which it was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fowler v. McCartneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by1 opinion
- Newman Grove State Bank v. LinderholmNebraska Supreme Court · 1903