Legal Opinion

Koby v. ARS National Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 2017No. 13-56964PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATFORD, Circuit Judge:

The magistrate judge in this case approved a class action settlement in which the named plaintiffs and class counsel got what they wanted but the remaining four million class members got worthless in-junctive relief. In exchange for receiving nothing of value, the class members gave up their right to assert damages claims against the defendant in any other class action. We are asked to decide two issues: whether the magistrate judge had the authority to exercise jurisdiction without obtaining the consent of all four million class members; and, assuming we get…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Usdc-CasfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Plac v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Elaine Levins v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery GrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API