Legal Opinion

Newton v. Anesthesia Services of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 2, 1994No. 1930537PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

St. Vincent’s Hospital petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to vacate his discovery order of December 3, 1993. We deny the writ.

The background of this case is as follows: Zeneca, Inc. (formerly Stuart Pharmaceuticals) and St. Vincent’s are codefendants in a medical malpractice/products liability action. St. Vincent’s filed a cross-claim against Zene-ca, alleging that Zeneca had failed to adequately warn the hospital of the dangers associated with the use of the product “Hibi-clens,” a pre-operative scrub the plaintiff says got into his eyes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte AMI West Alabama General Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Stringer v. State ex rel. ValeskaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte St. Vincent's Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API