Gainey v. Gainey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action for separate maintenance. Plaintiff married one Arthur Polk in Genessee County, Michigan, on or about April 12, 1935. Soon thereafter the parties to this marriage separated and did not live together thereafter. In 1936 plaintiff met the defendant herein in Flint, Michigan. They then went to Ohio, and settled near Youngstown. Plaintiff and defendant there bought and sold real property together as “husband and wife.” They were known in the community as Mr. and Mrs. Gainey and held themselves out as husband and wife. In 1943 plaintiff and defendant returned to Michigan, where…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Sweeley v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. One 1947 Cadillac 4-Dr. Sedan Engine No. 8433320California Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FontaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Marlowe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Henderson v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1969
- GERACEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967
- Gill v. BrickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954